Having recently read
about a company called HubSpot in a Harvard Business School article (HubSpot:
Inbound Marketing and Web 2.0, dated January 2011) and their philosophies
pertaining to marketing, the question arises as to whether or not companies
need to continue their traditional forms of outbound marketing. As direct mail, telemarketing, TV and radio advertising,
and traditional advertising in newspapers, journals and magazines has become
less effective and more costly, should marketing dollars continue to be spent
this way? Or, can firms refocus their
attention and spending on methods that draw leads that will more likely
translate into paying customers?
Through the utilization
of whitepapers, blogs, webinars, eBooks, videos, podcasts, social media, etc.,
companies can provide the information customers are looking for in order to
make educated buying decisions. They can
illuminate those who wish to know more in an intelligent manner, which in
itself will be persuasive in getting someone to go beyond just looking and
actually buying. The concern is whether
or not their potential customers are computer savvy enough to ask the right
questions and look in the right places for answers. Has the company properly set up their
websites and electronic documentation in such as way as to be easily found
through search engines, providing a direct pathway from customer to company? As there is more and more competition on the
web, will the company be crowded out and relegated to positions further down on
the list of search results?
I don't believe that most
companies could survive on inbound marketing alone. They need to continue using outbound
marketing, depending on the size of their target markets, as well as the
uniqueness and value of their products or services. If there is little differentiation between
their product and that of the competition, and there are many of them out
there, then they need to bombard potential consumers with reminders that they exist
and why customers should consider buying from them. Perhaps they need just enough advertising to
direct customers to inquire for more information and now take advantage of the
materials used for inbound marketing. If
nothing else, outbound marketing can concentrate on brand awareness. It may be product specific or more general,
if the company produces many different types of products.
A second purpose for
outbound marketing is to show people solutions to problems, especially when the
customers don't even know a problem exists.
If you didn't know you had a problem, then what would compel you to
search the internet for a solution? Here
inbound marketing does not work at all.
Yet with a little information to get their attention, to make them
aware, this potential customer will now have the motivation to consider
something that previously would never have crossed their mind. Consider the new Ford Focus that has active
park assist for parallel parking.
Although many people may have difficulty parallel parking, how many
would have thought there might actually be an affordable vehicle that would do
it for them? How many would have done an
online search to look for such a solution?
With traditional advertising, Ford has just made an entire population
aware of this innovative technology. By
the way, did you know it was launched in mid-2009? Perhaps this was available only on their
higher-end vehicles, but it was news to me this year with all of the
advertising for the Ford Focus. Now
consumers know it exists and are more likely to search online to see if it is
available on their preferred make of car and not just Fords.
I think you make a good point of people not knowing they have a problem, but I think this is one of the big issues with outbound marketing (and the associated budget). It is very hard to get someone to listen to you if they don't know they have a problem, and even harder to convince them that the problem is real and you have a solution. A lot of money and time is wasted converting these potential customers to customers. I think this is why trade shows, conferences, etc are a outbound tactic that will always have its place, reaching a lot of people in a single shot.
ReplyDeleteAs for the ford focus example, why not make a creative youtube video and make it go viral? Why not make a slideshow/photo album of parallel parking accidents and post it on facebook? Or put out a article out parking innovation on linkedIn? I think there a huge number of ways to market this innovation without going straight to TV or print.
There are some fine lines between inbound and outbound, but I think the cold calls, junk mail and spam are the way of the past. Unfortunately, I think that there is a high potential for inbound marketing to cross that line. Blogs are great, but i don't want a pop-up telling me to go to a blog.
To rule out "junk" or mass mailings is not a good idea. As I mentioned in your blog. Inbound should feed the outbound. A company may generate a 5,000 leads via inbound marketing. Those 5,000 leads now need to vetted via an outbound marketing plan.
ReplyDelete